Tracing, Tracking and Treating COVID-19 Associated Rhino-Orbito Cerebral Mucormycosis (ROCM).

Surge in the number of mucormycosis cases following second wave of coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) infection posed several diagnostic and prognostic challenges. This study was aimed to describe clinical, diagnostic features and survival outcomes among patients of mucormycosis in post COVID-19 context. Retrospective chart review. This study included 44 COVID-19 positive screened cases who presented with clinical features suggestive of mucormycosis. Demography, clinical profile, diagnostic findings, and the treatment outcome are studied. Medical and surgical outcomes are summarised as frequencies and percentages. The reliability of microbiological, and radiological findings against the pathological findings was analyzed using Kappa statistics (k). Based on constellation of microbiological, pathological and radiological findings 28 cases (63%) confirmed with mucormycosis infection. The mean (SD) age was 54.9 (12.9) years and two-third were males. The majority (90%) of cases presented with the feature of facial swelling, headache nasal blockade. Inpatient care for treatment of COVID-19 was recorded in 33 (75%). Diabetes mellitus was the commonest comorbidity in 27 (61.4%), 38 (86.4%) cases were treated by steroids and 30 (68.2%) were given oxygen therapy. There is a strong agreement (k = 0.83) between pathological and microbiological investigations. In thirty-eight cases (86.3%) remission was achieved when assessed after 8 weeks. Of the 44 cases, four patients died. The results of the current study suggest that the disease residues and/or recurrences in critical areas are frequent in mucormycosis. However, using the strategy of screening at risk patients, diagnosing, treating them with combination of antifungals, surgical debridement, and timely follow up may help in improving outcomes as compared to pre COVID-19 era.

Association of COVID-19 Real-Time Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) Cycle Threshold Value With Surrogate Markers of Disease Severity.

Introduction The cycle threshold (Ct) value in real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) serves as a criterion to diagnose coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and is inversely proportional to viral load. Levels of inflammatory markers such as aspartate aminotransferase (AST), ferritin, D-dimer, high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) are used as quantitative measures of COVID-19 severity. We examined the association between these markers and Ct values. Methodology This retrospective data analysis included 400 patients with positive RT-PCR results for COVID-19 who were admitted to a tertiary care hospital. Clinical and biochemical data were accessed from the hospital information management system. Associations of clinical parameters and markers of disease severity (e.g., polymorph, AST, hs-CRP, D-dimer, LDH, and ferritin levels) with Ct values were assessed. Observations LDH, ferritin, D-dimer, and hs-CRP were found to be significantly higher in moderate and severe groups than in the mild COVID-19 group. AST, ferritin, and hs-CRP levels were also significantly higher in severe COVID-19 subjects, compared to moderate COVID-19 subjects. Ct values for the E (envelop) gene and ORF (open reading frame) 1b gene were found to be significantly higher in those with severe COVID-19. Polymorph counts in subjects with Ct values of 25 or higher were significantly increased, compared to those with Ct values under 30. LDH, D-dimer, and hs-CRP levels in subjects with Ct values over 30 were significantly lower than for those with Ct values under 30. Ferritin was the best independent predictor of non-survival in study subjects, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 85.5% (95% confidence interval = 73.2-95.9). The Ct value for the E gene had an AUC of 75.1%, and the ORF1b gene had an AUC of 64.5%. However, no significant correlation was detected between any parameter and Ct value. Conclusion Polymorph, LDH, ferritin, D-dimer, and hs-CRP levels were significantly elevated in subjects with low E gene Ct values. Also, these subjects were at risk of severe disease and fatality. Ct values for the E gene thus could serve as an early indicator for patients at risk of severe disease and death.

Tracing, Tracking and Treating COVID-19 Associated Rhino-Orbito Cerebral Mucormycosis (ROCM)

Surge in the number of mucormycosis cases following second wave of coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) infection posed several diagnostic and prognostic challenges. This study was aimed to describe clinical, diagnostic features and survival outcomes among patients of mucormycosis in post COVID-19 context. Retrospective chart review. This study included 44 COVID-19 positive screened cases who presented with clinical features suggestive of mucormycosis. Demography, clinical profile, diagnostic findings, and the treatment outcome are studied. Medical and surgical outcomes are summarised as frequencies and percentages. The reliability of microbiological, and radiological findings against the pathological findings was analyzed using Kappa statistics (k). Based on constellation of microbiological, pathological and radiological findings 28 cases (63%) confirmed with mucormycosis infection. The mean (SD) age was 54.9 (12.9) years and two-third were males. The majority (90%) of cases presented with the feature of facial swelling, headache nasal blockade. Inpatient care for treatment of COVID-19 was recorded in 33 (75%). Diabetes mellitus was the commonest comorbidity in 27 (61.4%), 38 (86.4%) cases were treated by steroids and 30 (68.2%) were given oxygen therapy. There is a strong agreement (k = 0.83) between pathological and microbiological investigations. In thirty-eight cases (86.3%) remission was achieved when assessed after 8 weeks. Of the 44 cases, four patients died. The results of the current study suggest that the disease residues and/or recurrences in critical areas are frequent in mucormycosis. However, using the strategy of screening at risk patients, diagnosing, treating them with combination of antifungals, surgical debridement, and timely follow up may help in improving outcomes as compared to pre COVID-19 era.

Incidence of COVID-19 infection and its variation with demographic and clinical profile: lessons learned at a COVID-19 RT-PCR laboratory in Nagpur, India

Introduction. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic emerged as a global health crisis in 2020. The first case in India was reported on 30 January 2020 and the disease spread throughout the country within months. Old persons, immunocompromised patients and persons with co-morbidities, especially of the respiratory system, have a more severe and often fatal outcome to the disease. In this study we have analysed the socio-demographic trend of the COVID-19 outbreak in Nagpur and adjoining districts. Methods. The study was conducted from April to December 2020. Nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs collected from suspected cases of COVID-19 were tested using reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) at a diagnostic molecular laboratory at a tertiary care hospital in central India. Patient-related data on demographic profile and indication for testing were obtained from laboratory requisition forms. The results of the inconclusive repeat samples were also noted. The data were analysed using SPSS v24.0. Results. A total of 46 898 samples were received from April to December 2020, of which 41 410 were included in the study;90.6 % of samples belonged to adults and 9.4 % belonged to children. The overall positivity rate in the samples was 19.3 %, although it varied over the period. The yield was significantly high in the elderly age group (25.5 %) and symptomatic patients (22.6 %). On repeat testing of patients whose first test was inconclusive, 17.1% were positive. There was a steady increase of both the number of tests and the rate of positivity in the initial period of the study, followed by a sharp decline. Conclusion. We can conclude that rigorous contact tracing and COVID-appropriate behaviour (wearing a mask, social distancing and hand hygiene) are required to break the chain of transmission. Elderly people are more susceptible to infection and should follow stringent precautions. It is also important to perform repeat testing of those individuals whose tests are inconclusive with fresh samples so that no positive cases are missed. Understanding of demographics is crucial for better management of this crisis and proper allocation of resources.

Incidence of COVID-19 infection and its variation with demographic and clinical profile: lessons learned at a COVID-19 RT-PCR laboratory in Nagpur, India.

Introduction. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic emerged as a global health crisis in 2020. The first case in India was reported on 30 January 2020 and the disease spread throughout the country within months. Old persons, immunocompromised patients and persons with co-morbidities, especially of the respiratory system, have a more severe and often fatal outcome to the disease. In this study we have analysed the socio-demographic trend of the COVID-19 outbreak in Nagpur and adjoining districts. Methods. The study was conducted from April to December 2020. Nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs collected from suspected cases of COVID-19 were tested using reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) at a diagnostic molecular laboratory at a tertiary care hospital in central India. Patient-related data on demographic profile and indication for testing were obtained from laboratory requisition forms. The results of the inconclusive repeat samples were also noted. The data were analysed using SPSS v24.0. Results. A total of 46 898 samples were received from April to December 2020, of which 41 410 were included in the study; 90.6 % of samples belonged to adults and 9.4 % belonged to children. The overall positivity rate in the samples was 19.3 %, although it varied over the period. The yield was significantly high in the elderly age group (25.5 %) and symptomatic patients (22.6 %). On repeat testing of patients whose first test was inconclusive, 17.1% were positive. There was a steady increase of both the number of tests and the rate of positivity in the initial period of the study, followed by a sharp decline. Conclusion. We can conclude that rigorous contact tracing and COVID-appropriate behaviour (wearing a mask, social distancing and hand hygiene) are required to break the chain of transmission. Elderly people are more susceptible to infection and should follow stringent precautions. It is also important to perform repeat testing of those individuals whose tests are inconclusive with fresh samples so that no positive cases are missed. Understanding of demographics is crucial for better management of this crisis and proper allocation of resources.

Symptomatology and Relationship Between Symptoms and Duration Among COVID-19 Patients in a COVID-19 Care Hospital in Central India.

The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the world population across the globe. India has the second largest number of cases and the third largest number of deaths due to COVID-19 in the world. There have been close to 4.4 lakh deaths due to COVID-19 in India alone. The second wave in India has led to devastating consequences, particularly among the young population. The initial clinical symptoms of COVID-19 are similar to all types of viral pneumonia, with varying degrees of severity. The cases' clinical manifestations include fever, nonproductive cough, dyspnea, myalgia, and fatigue. This study was undertaken with the purpose of identifying the relationship between the symptoms and duration in COVID-19-affected patients. The common presenting symptoms were fever (44.5%), sore throat (38.7%), and cough (36.12%). Most of the cases presented with a combination of fever with cough (35%) and fever with sore throat (33%). The duration of symptoms varied from one to 17 days with a mean of 5.75 days. Despite vaccination being started, the risk of the imminent third wave in the country is existential. Mutations in the coronavirus pose a threat to the vulnerable population. It is important to identify the combination of symptoms most predictive of COVID-19 to help guide recommendations for self-isolation, testing, and preventing further spread of the disease. Further studies using these models can yield better results in surveillance and containing this infectious disease.

Conventional Naso-Oropharyngeal Sampling Versus Self-Collected Saliva Samples in COVID-19 Testing.

Comparing the diagnostic utility of salivary specimen samples with conventional nasopharynx-oropharynx (NP-OP) specimen samples to identify COVID-19 cases by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Eighty COVID-19 suspects enrolled for the paired sampling. In addition to conventional sampling, suspects were asked to follow stepwise pictorial instructions for self salivary sampling. Separate nylon swab stick was used for taking the samples from NP-OP and the floor of the oral cavity. The data were analyzed for sensitivity, specificity, concordance of COVID-19 status, and limits of agreement for cycle threshold (ct) values by either method. Forty-nine suspects (61.3%) were males, the mean age was 36.4 years. To determine the diagnostic test performance of the saliva, RT-PCR results of the NP-OP samples were used as the reference standard. Out of 80 suspects, 41 showed positivity by NP-OP swabs and 12 by salivary samples. The salivary samples showed significantly lesser positivity rate. The sensitivity and specificity of salivary samples against conventional reference standards are 24.4%, 94.9% respectively. Concordance of these two types of samples in terms of agreement kappa statistics is estimated as K = 0.252 (0.09-0.42). Median ct values of both the E and ORF1ab gene for the salivary samples were higher compared to the corresponding NP-OP sample. This study showed lesser sensitivity with salivary swab samples as compared to conventional NP-OP sampling for RT-PCR, COVID-19 detection. Hence, we are of opinion that more studies are required to establish the utility of salivary sampling in COVID-19 diagnostics.

A comparison of swab types on sample adequacy, suspects comfort and provider preference in COVID-19.

AIM: This study was aimed to compare the virological, suspect reported outcomes and provider preferences during COVID-19 swab taking procedure used for sampling. METHODS: The COVID-19 suspects are subjected to nasopharyngeal (NP) and oropharyngeal (OP) swabs for testing. Two types of swabs (Nylon and Dacron) are used for sample collection. Prospectively each suspect's response is collected and assessed for self-reported comfort level. The provider's experience with each suspect and virological outcomes recorded separately. The sample adequacy was compared based on swab types and demographic characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 1008 COVID-19 suspects were considered for comparison of various outcomes. Dacron and flocked Nylon swab sticks are used for taking 530 and 478 samples, respectively. Suspects who underwent the procedure using Nylon swabs were six times more likely to have pain/discomfort compared to when Dacron swab was used (Adj RR (95% CI: 6.76 (3.53 to 13, p=0.0001))). The providers perceived six times more resistance with the Nylon swabs compared to Dacron Swabs (Adj RR (95% CI: 5.96 (3.88 to 9.14, p=0.0001))). The pediatric population had a higher rate of blood staining in Dacron swab [Dacron 66 (80.5%); Nylon 51 (54.8%) p=0.0001]. The sample adequacy rate and laboratory positivity rate were not significantly different from each other. CONCLUSIONS: Given the comparable virological outcomes, the difference in suspect and providers comfort should drive swab selection based on characteristics of the suspects. The bulbous Nylon swab caused more pain/discomfort in adults compared to Dacron.

Testing Olfactory and Gustatory Dysfunctions among Quarantine COVID-19 Suspects.

The World Health Organization (WHO) has cautioned on specific respiratory symptoms for suspecting an individual of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Meanwhile, many suspects are reporting dysfunctions of smell and taste. This study aimed to investigate the percentage of positive COVID-19 who had associated loss of sensation as detected by psychophysical testing. Eight hundred and thirty two suspects were enrolled. At the time of sampling for testing COVID-19 status, olfactory dysfunction (OD) and gustatory dysfunction (GD) tested using odorants like coffee and camphor and solutions of sweet and salty solvants, respectively. The strength of the association between test results of these sensory losses and COVID-19 positivity was assessed by calculating sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. The responses in positive and negative individuals presented as age-adjusted odds ratio with 95% CI. Seventy six (9.1%) [95% CI: 7.4%-11.3%] of 832 suspects were tested positive for COVID-19. Paediatric cases of age between 2 and 10 years could not reply appropriately, hence OD in 134 and GD in 118 could not be tested. Anosmia or hyposmia was present in 62 (81.6%) and ageusia in 64 (84.2%) of the total 76 confirmed cases. The OD and GD dysfunctions were significantly higher among confirmed COVID-19 cases compared to negative subjects [Adj OR (95% CI): Smell 3.22 (1.77-5.88); taste 3.05 (1.61-5.76), p < 0.001]. In this study, testing of smell and taste dysfunctions had higher sensitivity in identifying recent-onset loss of sensations in COVID-19 cases. Hence, it may be used as a simple and cost-effective screening test.